Posted by: luvin | November 28, 2009

RIDO

After the  Maguindanao massacre, what are the expectations of the ordinary people from Mindanao. My instict tell me that there will be vengeance looming somewhere sometime. I and many others expect that to happen, and it will happen, because it could happen.

Am I a bit worried that it could happen? To be very honest, no. Why? because it is not my fight, it is not my battle. Thats the way things are conducted here. Do not dip your fingers on your neighborhs plate. Of course I was shocked by the incident, and I am still trying to understand the complexity of this massacre.

This may a bit too gruesome or barbaric for people in a civilize society, but there are places in this world that have unique and gruesome  means to settle grievances. Genearally, the non muslims of course do not adhere to that kind of conflict resolution, but in unique situations, they would also resort to similar resolution, because when in Rome you have to behave how the Romans are behaving. (Are we norturing the culture of violence here, or we are simply doing what is necessary).

Rido is not only a simple clan war for power. It goes with it the traditional vendetta that is passed on from one generation to another. One reason why guns are very important in the cultural context of the muslims. One reason why I can not and should not participate in their fights, because it is their fight that may go on till the bad blood is thinly washed by time. The real meaning of rido is already mangled beyond recognition. It is far from settling disputes, but closer to vengeance. It is the traditional practice of pinnance, of paying blood for blood debt.

The Maguindanao massacre however, is not simple rido, it is political power played to its brutal end. This is the result when man is so drunk with power and he has guns to imposed his will. This is the result when the government institutions are weak.  This is the result when government policies and stuctures are not congruent to the local needs.

I would like to end this article with a comment from a Sinsuat whom I have some conversation way back, we were talking about local politics and governance, he said; “the local politicians today are luckier compared to their counterparts in the past because today elected local politicians have honorariom and IRA.”

Posted by: luvin | November 25, 2009

The New Kings

In the royalty lineage of the mindanao’s moro group, the Ampatuans and Mangudadatos are the new Kings of the Sultanate of Maguindanao and Rajah sa Buayan.

Who are these people before they become what they are today? Today these people who in the 70’s could hardly make the ends meet live in mansions and palaces. Visit their places if you would like to see it for your selves, or even visit Davao City and see how palatial their homes are.

The recent massacre have once again added another blackeye to the already bruised image of Mindanao. This is a war for their kingdom, and the losers are the people and Mindanao as a whole. Another step backwards.

Many people who do not understand Muslim Mindanao are wont to suggest the barbarism of these people, and the inutility of this government and the past governments to control warlordism. But to be very simplistic about this incident, this is an event that could happen because the culture and the environment is encouraging it to happen. Warlordism is not unique to Mindanao. This is the same problem that beset Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc.

Most in the media are wondering why the government is helpless in addressing this problem? Loose firearms is viewed as one of the culprit, and why the is the government allowing this proliferation of these deadly arms is a question that is high on the list. People who are viewing this problem along the lenses of different cultures will never understand the difficulty of controlling these armed men. If american soldiers who were heavily armed with the most sophisticated and trained according to the latest warfare techniques could not subdue a loose group like the Abu Sayaf whose number is between 100 to 200, how can we expect the PNP to handle the armed groups of these local warlords whose  number would equal those of the MILF.

I hope the people in mainstream media, the government and other private sector will try to see this problem in the right context. Not in the context of what manila would like to live, but according to our different cultures and practices.

Posted by: luvin | November 19, 2009

Deconstructing Manny

This article is just fantastic, as Pacquaio’s win. I’d like to share it with you. There are just too many relevant reverences.

 

DECONSTRUCTING MANNY

By Springs Toledo


Manny Pacquiao:  I’m just [an] ordinary fighter…


Freddie Roach (interrupting): –You’re not ordinary.


Manny Pacquiao: Sorry about that, master.

“He finds gaps,” said Emanuel Steward after Manny Pacquiao stopped Miguel Cotto in the twelfth round. Those three words mirror the words of a far older, far more legendary war tactician: Sun Tzu. “Strike at their gaps,” The Art of War asserted two thousand years ago, “attack when they are lax, don’t let the enemy figure out how to prepare.” The second knockdown of Cotto illustrated this theory. Cotto, a conventional boxer-puncher, was hit in the fourth round by an uppercut from the left side that went inside and underneath his guard, exploding off the side of his chin. Pacquiao found a gap, capitalized on the momentary carelessness of an onrushing opponent, and spent the rest of the fight exploding every potential solution Cotto thought he had.  

“When you are going to attack nearby make it look as if you are going to go a long way,” Sun Tzu said, “when you are going to attack far away, make it look as if you are going just a short distance.” Pacquiao seems to be moving out when he’s coming in and coming in when he’s moving out. He exploits expectations with illusions. He “draws them in” and then “takes them by confusion.” Trainer Freddie Roach, himself a former professional boxer, agrees that Pacquiao is “very hard to read.” Pacquiao continues punching when his opponent expects a pause, his angles are bizarre, and he is often not where he is expected to be after a combination. Due to such unorthodoxies, this southpaw is a master of destroying the timing and rhythm of a conventional fighter. He is similar to Joe Calzaghe in that regard. Mikkel Kessler said that Calzaghe “ruins your boxing.” Indeed, Pacquiao does worse than that.  

While a disruptive boxer like Calzaghe spills ink all over your blueprint and laughs about it, Pacquiao ruins your blueprint, but then adds injury to insult by crashing the drafting table over your head.  

THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MANNY
Pacquiao has athletic gifts that translate well in the ring: disruptive rhythm, timing, and speed, all financed by shocking power that belies his featherweight frame. As if this weren’t enough, his whiskers safely absorbed the shock of Cotto’s left hooks. He was never hurt, which raises eyebrows. Manny, we must remember, was exchanging punches in a division forty pounds north of the one he began in. And he reveled in it, he invited it, even snarling at times and standing disdainfully in the final stanzas to challenge the manhood of the retreating Puerto Rican. Roberto Duran, 58, watched from the crowd. His coal-black eyes remembering the night he dethroned another welterweight who thought he could outgun a smaller man. Duran watched Pacquiao’s black hair flying with the force of his blows, his beard paying unintentional tribute. A smile, once sinister, betrayed his lips.  

Despite the glory heaped on him by a celebrity-starved public and an island nation eager for eminence, Pacquiao is not the flawless fighter that Duran was when he handed Sugar Ray Leonard his first defeat. Pacquiao’s humanity can be sensed if not seen in his nervousness as battle commences. It takes him a round or two to find his rhythm and gauge his distance and timing. Before that happens he is prone to reach in, get off balance in range, and will often leave windows open for counters. After that happens, his opponent, any opponent, is in peril.

He can be controlled, particularly by welterweights, but it will take a trainer and a fighter who are willing to give up conventional strategies and think out of the box. Convention is broken down by revolution, and Manny Pacquiao fights like a revolution.
 
Alas, even the trainer who recognizes the need for a counter-revolutionary strategy is faced with another problem –the trainer in the other corner:  

Freddie Roach. The formidable Freddie Roach.  

Roach has Parkinson’s disease, which has burdened him with tremors, slurring, and odd pauses during conversations. Its symptoms can be as disconcerting to conventional conversationalists as Manny Pacquiao’s style is to conventional fighters; but his disability also gives him an aura of alien brilliance like Stephen Hawking.  

It has had no effect on his knack for strategy.  

Roach did well not to tamper with Pacquiao’s unorthodoxy. He streamlined it and added balance, deliberate feints, angles, defense, and a two-fisted attack. Like Floyd Mayweather Jr., Manny Pacquiao has a foundation in fundamentals. Unlike Mayweather, Pacquiao’s lessons occurred later in his career, while Floyd’s were drilled into him as a small child. Also unlike Mayweather who claims to disdain strategy, Manny enters the ring with a master plan or three. Sun Tzu emphasized this: “Victorious warriors win first and then go to war.” Roach spends hours and days and weeks and months in study. He deconstructs his opponent and finds patterns –“habits” as he calls them, to exploit. Then he teaches Manny to “see it as [he] sees it.”

At times, the eyes of Freddie Roach seem to focus on a higher plane inaccessible to anyone else. Perhaps he communes with the ghost of Eddie Futch. Futch was his mentor, and was among the greatest trainers of the 20th century. Futch sparred with Joe Louis and learned his trade in the company of master boxers like Holman Williams. He was the strategist behind the first defeat of Muhammad Ali by Joe Frazier, the second defeat of Ali by Ken Norton, Riddick Bowe’s defeat of the undefeated Evander Holyfield, and Montell Griffin’s disqualification win over the undefeated Roy Jones. Freddie Roach learned at his knee. Manny Pacquiao learned at Freddie’s.  

The most popular boxer in the world today was catapulted into stardom after he defeated Oscar De La Hoya and then Ricky Hatton. Serious boxing fans know the truth. De La Hoya and Hatton were simply two candles on a cake already baked between 2003 and 2008 by great Mexicans from the lower weight divisions: Marco Antonio Barrera, Erik Morales, and Juan Manuel Marquez. These are the men who tried him in fire much like Murderers’ Row tried Archie Moore in the 1940s and Philadelphia tried Marvelous Marvin Hagler in the 1970s. Pacquiao has evolved bloodily into a complete fighter and then some. He is an experienced, natural athlete with power that exponentially rises with weight. He has a style that is as confusing as a hall of mirrors and as difficult to solve as Chinese math. He is a willing student with an expanding set of skills. Behind him stands a trainer with a direct link to Eddie Futch who was a product of boxing’s golden decade and rubbed shoulders with many gods of war. Manny’s pugilistic pedigree summons the gold of yesterday to overcome the iron of today.  

HAIL MANNY, FULL OF GRACE
Boxing is a character sport first and a skills sport second. Manny’s character was formed in a background that is ideal for a fighter –a background set in the kind of third world poverty that Americans have not known for seventy years, but a background known to spawn fighters in back alleys amid broken bottles and broken dreams. Manny ran away from home at fourteen to spare his mother one more mouth to feed. He exchanged real poverty for worse poverty –in an act of sacrifice. This fighter has not only suffered, he also understood and embraced self-denial at early adolescence.  

The toughest sport in the world is easy for someone like him. Pacquiao has something to fight for as only a poor man can, for self, for family, for country. He has the discipline to do it, and he has the perspective to transcend it. The Sweet Science is meaningful to him; his participation in it is an expression of love and loyalty, of self-actualization. So he approaches battle with joy.  

And that isn’t all.  

Manny believes that the hand of God himself is on his shoulder. Cynical secularism may scoff at such ancient notions, but irreverence is irrelevant here. Manny believes this –utterly. And it gives him an edge in that he is completely self-possessed and palpably unconcerned with the risks of the ring. He goes not only willingly, but happily. Throughout history, like-minded people have strode confidently into lion’s dens, climbed into kamikaze cockpits, blown themselves up at market places, sang while burning at a stake, and volunteered to die first at Nazi death camps to spare strangers. Pacquiao’s religiosity is that kind of powerful. It is a major reason why he smiles and waves on his way to battle dragons.  

Boxing fans take note: his frame of mind was shared by Sugar Ray Robinson and Muhammad Ali.  

Emanuel Steward’s assertion that the thirty-year-old welterweight champion, now 50-3-2, belongs “up there” with Ali and Robinson was half-wrong. When Robinson was thirty, he was defeated once in 131 bouts and went on to finish his career with the scalps of eighteen world champions hanging from his belt. Manny isn’t near that. He is a typhoon blowing over structures less sturdy than those built in the golden era of boxing. But remember, he isn’t finished yet.  

Like the legends before him, Manny Pacquiao sees himself as a man of destiny… a patriot fighting for a flag, a Christian laughing at lions… Such men are rarely taken down by anything except time and hubris. They are larger than their foes even when they are not.  

Such men are larger than themselves.
 
 
 

 
…..
Springs Toledo can be contacted at scalinatella@hotmail.com. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


add to Facebook add to Myspace add to Digg add to Mixx add to Linkedin add to Yahoo Buzz

// <![CDATA[
var isVoted = false;

function castPoll() {
if(isVoted && false) {
alert('You have already voted in this poll. Thank you.');
return false;
}
form = document.poll;
vote = 0;
for (var i = 0; i

ultimoshogun:  Wow! Great article Springs! I don’t know much of Manny’s background other than he like so many others came from humble beginnings, but the story of him running away to spare his mother was very touching. He’s truly an honorable man and deserves everything he has today. On another note, Floyd Mayweather is scheduled to appear on George Lopez’s late show tomorrow night. I haven’t watched the show but I’ll tune in for this one to see if George, who’s a boxing fan brings up Pacquiao and asks the tough questions. De La Hoya will be on tonight.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 11:49:07 AM
deepwater:  I will never doubt manny again. pacman is the gold standard in boxing.mayweather is just like the dollar,cheap with no intrinsic value. buy gold now! dump the dollar.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 12:03:50 PM
#1 PacFan “P4P King”:  Very great article! I really believe though that Manny has truly reached the top like many of the greats have. He deserves to be considered among the best like Robinson and Ali. Imagine when this great little retires? What will they say? Congrats Manny “Pacman” Pacquiao for your great accomplishment by winning your record 7 world titles in seven different divisions and the only man to have won 4 lineal world titles.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 12:17:05 PM
David:  Fantastic article. Something tells me Manny is just getting started. I’ve been a boxing fan for years, but I’m only 23. I can tell you that never in my life have I seen this kind of excitement around a fighter. This isn’t something created by the hype machine in hopes of getting our dollar; this is a guy that actually delivers when he steps into the ring with the kind of scintillating performance that separates this sport from any other. I feel like my generation is finally going to have the era in boxing that we deserve; not just great fights (which we’ve had, but are largely ignored by the media) but the kind of transcendent, earth-shaking confrontations that make it the greatest sport in the world. Is Pacquiao vs. Mayweather one of those bouts? Or will it be like Pac vs. Cotto, where it’s highly competitive for the first half before turning into a bloody rout? Whatever the case, boxing is back in the public eye where it belongs, and I can’t imagine a better emissary for the sport than Manny. Outside of the ring he’s a model citizen; inside he’s a monster. What more can you ask?
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 01:07:24 PM
TheNCube:  The very best article I’ve read on Freddie and Manny. Thank you.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 01:10:18 PM
mabii:  Abslolutely great article! I vote for it as article of the year.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 01:10:42 PM
Yuvie:  Nice article! Viva Pacquiao! I second Mabii’s vote.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 01:51:23 PM
RED:  “Emanuel Steward’s assertion that the thirty-year-old welterweight champion, now 50-3-2, belongs “up there” with Ali and Robinson was half-wrong. When Robinson was thirty, he was defeated once in 131 bouts and went on to finish his career with the scalps of eighteen world champions hanging from his belt. Manny isn’t near that. He is a typhoon blowing over structures less sturdy than those built in the golden era of boxing. But remember, he isn’t finished yet.” Thank you, ST. I rest my case. Hopefully, my fellow TSS brothers will now look at my recent statements regarding Manny’s stature in our beloved sport in the correct light.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 02:20:21 PM
Einar:  On a site chock full of great fight writing this piece tops them all. Mr. Toledo, hat-in-hand I nod. Beautiful writing. Many, many thanks.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 02:27:27 PM
jose:  great article, i love irreverance is irrelevant
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 02:33:41 PM
Frank Z:  *Applause* well done. manny’s indeed gone through the wars when coming up under 135, which is why he does make the fights look easy now. there’s many roads to rome in this case. floyd mayweather’s been bred honed and born to box purely from age 0, shane mosley hsa been trained and mentored by his father who acted almost like a big brother and gravitated to boxing because he loved it, pacquiao had to fight first before he learned to box, so boxing is almost like a refuge for him. he has that poor country style that you see with his all out blazing aggression and willingness to take to give, the difference being that he’s a talented athlete. btw one reason i b elieve that he’s carried his power up in weight is becuase he’s no longer weight trained. he walks around at about 150 and cutting down to 130 would be too much for most. this reminds me that weigh ins should be on the day of the fight to maximize performance not the day before, but i digress.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 02:42:17 PM
Radam G – :  Wow! Fightwriter Springs T, nice copy! So nice that I had to read it twice. I think I’ll go for thrice. I be back in a minute….Okay I am back! OMG! A MASTERPIECE for college and military studies of — not only the “Art of War,” but the “Are of Masterpiece scribing. I’m impressed! Other fightwriters and writers in general can learn from how this story weaved together a personality feature and straight-out kicka$$ war philosophy. A good trainer is indeed equal to a field marshal or five-star general. Trainers as the late, great boxing guru Eddie Futch, Angie Dundee, Manny Steward, the late Billy Miller, the late Junior Robles, the late Sarge Johnson, the late Champ Chainey, the late Frankie Karr, Joe Cloud and now Freddie Roach are in the same league with Sun Tzu, Alexander The Great, Genghis Khan. the Prophet Moses, General Douglas MacArthur and many more great.There will be no deconstruction of PacMAN by Money May. Family has not learn the full Art of War, just the talk — pure propaganda! And this is for his audience, not people with iota of a brain. Holla!
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 02:58:27 PM
swift:  Nice Article! I agree, I think people are jumping the gun calling him the greatest ever, but he is in the conversation of great fighters and that’s saying something. One thing people have to realize is that the weight that Manny gained to win titles is very small. Think about it, from 112-130 are five titles. 18 lbs and five titles? I’m not knocking Manny at all, but what I am saying is guys like James Toney, Roy Jones, Thomas Hearns and a few others have done pretty much the same thing! But without the titles! The one thing I love about Manny is he fights the best regardless of weight and fights like he was fighting a 112 lb fighter…
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 03:04:14 PM
Robert Curtis:  Excellent stuff, Springs! I don’t know if Manny will ever have the opportunity to equal the records/numbers of the greats you mention in today’s boxing climate. The same frenzy of competition and diversity of competitors does not exist. Also, as you point out, Springs, 70 years ago we had poverty and desperation in the USA similar to today’s so-called Third World. Robinson, Louis, Moore, Williams, Armstrong, Bur-ley, etc. were all children of the Depression and the pre-civil rights era. It took incredible courage and dedication for them to succeed. But even if Pacman retires next week, I still think he deserves comparison to the all time greats. He won’t have to fight 131 fights to prove his greatness to me.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 03:11:35 PM
brownsugar,.. Is welterweight at 145 or 147 now??:  Manny will always be a great fighter in my eyes,.. but he hasn’t even scratched the surface at 147 yet,… it seems like the 147 limit has now become the 145 limit just to accommodate Manny,.. because that’s his best weight,.. I still hold Cotto, Berto, Clottey,.Williams, Shane and even Mayweather well ahead as far as thier accomplishments go,… at the welter weight limit,…. as opposes Manny,s conquests at 145 because they campaigned at the true limit numerous times,.. wins over the dried out competition notwithstanding,.. Pac still has the potential to make a name at 147,.. whenever Roach and company decide to take on the welters at their true limit,.. hope it happens but it appears doubtful.. forcing guys to abandon their true weight to come in the fight weak does not lay the groundwork for a memmorable stint in the welterweight division for Pac,………. what??,…. are welterweights supposed to fight at 145 now just to give Manny a chance? to win a title that has been eternally sanctioned at 147??? even guys like David Haye didn’t force Valuez to lose his 100 pound advantage,..and still won,.. Roy didn’t have to make Ruiz come down to cruiser in order to beat him,…. and Sugar didn’t starve out Hagler for his win middleweight,.. Hammerin Hank held 3 titles at once without changing the weights,..Catchweights for titles is a trend that’s destroying the integrity of the once Hallowed welterweight Crowns….Roach will probably never let Manny show his talent at the full limit,.. as long as the business of boxing permits hard-up boxers to continue to starve themselves to earn 6 figures,… sad development fo’ sho’,…….
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 03:38:56 PM
joe Rein:  Keenly insightful, elegant read, Springs. It’s what I wish boxing writing would be, but rarely is.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 04:24:07 PM
The Saint:  @Floyd Mayweather Sr aka Brownsugar: Get over it. Pacquiao is one of the greatest. Whether or not he’s THE greatest, who cares, and how do you measure that, anyway? Pacquiao’s career is not a fabricated one like De La Hoya’s or Mayweather’s, and he doesn’t need a paper trail of “accomplishments” to prove his greatness. I don’t care about his 7 titles in as many weight divisions, it doesn’t mean much to me. But he’s an all time great, and only two people on this planet disagree (Mayweather Jr and Sr).
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 04:34:52 PM
Frank Z@brownsugar:  Very valid point, a good aomunt of this praise is being overstated. pacquiao has yet to fight a true welterweight at welterweight. all the more reason iw oudl like him to fight floyd and then shane if he is to continue at this weight.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 04:37:24 PM
#1 PacFan “Pacquiao #3 on ATG list”:  If Mayweather’s accomplishments is considered better than Manny’s then I say hell with you. If you say Mayweather is the GREATEST OF ALL TIME then I say Manny Pacquiao is GOD of boxing. No matter which way you look at it Mayweather will always be at the bottom looking up at Manny. Who will one day be THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 04:46:55 PM
ali is not top 3 all-time:  @ BROWNSUGAR Great points I think he should be ok with fighting guys at the 147 limit now he’s proved he can handle it. Fredie Roach is still talking about he wants Mayweather to come down to 145 dude has lost his mind. See little stupid $hit like that will make the fight even harder to make this is a no brainer. The only problem they should have is about money if people (im talking about both sides) argue about ring size,gloves, weight Ect the fight will never happen.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 05:00:56 PM
ali:  I meant to say Pac is not in the top 3 all-time
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 05:01:56 PM
@ali:  Show me 1 source of Roach wanting Mayweather to come down to 145. That’s a LIE. Get these lies off here.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 05:12:32 PM
manboobs the great:  Geez!!! Like Manny much? LOL Good read man, seriously.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 05:33:11 PM
@@ali:  haha! seems like anything ali has to say has no credibility.. just like his hero mayweather.
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 05:33:52 PM
Fe’Roz (repost):  Floyd has never fought anybody like Pacqiauo……because there has never been anyone quite like Manny. We are watching something very unique. Someone for whom there is no blueprint because every time the ink dries, Manny keeps changing…. for the better. Looking at tapes won’t help. Yesterday’s Manny is not today’s….and today’s Manny is not tomorrow’s. And not incrementally. Like superman, he moves in leaps and bounds. First he’s one handed. Then he’s not. His right is as good as his left. He can hit with power from both sides. His rhythm punching has not comparables. His power keeps increasing with his strength. His strength and stamina are uncanny; his punch resistance their equal. Literally, every time we have seen him fight, he gets better. If and when Floyd fights Manny, he will need more than a pedigree and and undefeated record. He will need more than a shoulder roll…..and the ability to adjust. For Manny means business…..and Floyd better be ready. He will be fighting for his life
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 06:07:00 PM
Jay:  Simply amazing and moving! You should write a book or a documentary. Great read, bookmarked this page. Thanks!
Wednesday Nov 18, 2009 06:12:37 PM
Posted by: luvin | November 8, 2009

My next President?

Even as an ordinary citizen, I have the responsibility to choose wisely the next president of this disaster prone country. “My vote counts”, is a cliche, but it keeps on appearing and repeating itself, and its meaning is not limited at voting somebody and making sure that it is being counted properly, but also on how should I go about the selection process. At first glance, tv and print articles would provide a clue on who to vote. But the longer I ponder about it, the more difficult the task seem to be.

My first approach which I advocated earlier, was to treat this presidential election as a search for the most qualified manager. My proposition is for the voter to assume that he/she owns a big company, perhaps as big as the Philippines, and that she/he is looking for a manager to run the affairs of the company. The natural tendency then in selecting who to hire is to look at the qualification, and the integrity of the applicants. Naturally, if you are looking for a manager you will not settle for somebody who do not have the tiniest idea on how to manage, or do not have the honesty and integrity to run the affairs of your company. I tried this approach to some. I asked them this question; If your are looking for a manager, would you choose Noynoy, Villar, Teodoro, or Estrada? The most common choice are Teodoro and Villar. Sometimes though, they have difficulty on whom to choose between the two.

Even I have some difficulty in deciding between the two equally capable protagonist. Villar has a proven track record in the private and public sector. He has the single minded focus of a determined businessman, a trait that would certainly produce result. Teodoro has also proven his skills in the public management with his stint in the Department of National Defence, though his experience may not be as extinsive as that wtih Villar, he already is a proven commodity, and he is more eloquent and articulate.

My approach in breaking the deadlock is to look at their advocacies and platform of government. I like Villar’s approach of creating an entrepreneurial atmosphere. He’s view of competing government istitution, which is akin to the business competition, is also a new and attractive approach. On the other side, I also like  Teodoro’s talk about structural reform. I for one is pushing of federalism so it is understandable that I have a bias for candidates that advocating or leaning towards thesame agenda.

But  I am still in a bind.

My third approach is to look at the needs or major problem of the country. And what are these; First, I believe that we have a structurally defective governmental system., that resulted to its ineffectivity. So much centralization  also contributed greatly to the corrupt practices in almost every aspect of the government. Corruption is so rampant that it now becoming cultural. Second, Mindanao. The trouble in Mindanao is dragging the country. Investment do not come in because of the overly sensationalize conflict. Mindanao also failed to grow as much as it can because of the negligible attention that national government is giving it. Third, is the business climate. A great portion, about 90%, of business enterprises are controlled by about 5% of the population. The disparity is so wide, that the interest of the few would often block to economic development of the poor.

 

In summary, what am looking at, and my selection process would look like this:

1. Start with the salient needs, the problems of the state.

2. What are the platform of government of these candidates?

3. Who has the skills, the integrity,honest, and the capability  to carry out the offered solution?

Posted by: luvin | November 5, 2009

A Presidential Challenge, For Noynoy

To be a head of state is a position that not everyone could have the chance to have, not even a chance to dream of. But with it goes the gargantuan task of carrying the dreams of the nation, of making those dreams a reality, a task so many before have failed to accomplished.

Noynoy Aquino, inspite of his lack of managerial skills, inspite of his low intellectual capacity, inspite of his wimp like aura, is being hailed by those who want to be in power, as the Obama of the 2010 RP presidential election. People like Conrad De Quiros, because of his hatred to the present adminstration, specially his hate to GMA, seems to lost the basic objectivity. He sees a messiah in Noynoy because of his integrity, he sees a saviour with Noynoy because of his honesty, he sees bright hope for the Philippines because of Noynoy.

I feel sorry for him. His logic is now very distorted.  This country will never move when progress will be hinged on people like Noynoy who did not even lifted a finger with regards to hacienda Luisita.

Hacienda Luisita is a very big shame to the Corazon Aquino presidency. It is a prime example of the elite just trying to make use of their position to enhanced their control of their loot. Can’t Noynoy see the injusice in their estate. If Cory is indeed for the people, why did she skirted the agrarian law. If Noynoy, indeed, is a true leader, why didn’t he lift a finger to correct the injustice?

Noynoy is not man enough to go against the injustices done by his parents and relatives. Noynoy do not have the courage, to oppose the obvious mistakes done by his mother.

With those apparent flaws in his character, and lack of leadership and managerial skill, there is a very small window of chance that change will happen during his presidency.

Posted by: luvin | November 1, 2009

No New Posting

The last week I failed to post due to some very important thing that must be done first. I you play chess you will understand this.

I prepared for a club tournament. After eight months of playing again, and after a dismall performance three months ago(winning 29% of my game), I would like to see how I am improving with my chess.

The result is very good. A 72% winning percentage.

Posted by: luvin | October 15, 2009

Campaign Issues

During the latest presidential debate initiated by ANZ, one issue presidentiables tried to tackle is the Mindanao Conflict. It is unfortunate that Mindanao is perenially viewed as a war zone. It pains me to hear thesame story line over the years. Mindanao is not only about the muslim struggle for self determination. We the non muslim likewise desire for greater freedom to determine our future.

Equally  disheartening are the views of our presidentiables on how to solve the conflict. Most have given motherhood statements, so I will no longer elaborate on each answer.

I would like to venture though on how I viewed this moro conflict, and possibly offer some idea on how this could be handled. Some observation listed below could be my basis.

1. The Moro struggle, is a struggle of the moro elite to regain control of their lost kingdom.

2. The Muslims (I am using it as generic for all group, Maguindanao, Maranao, Tausog, Iranon, etc. Not the religion which would be referred to as Islam), are not united, but they are symphatytic to the cause.

3. The muslim-struggle  leaders are  highly educated in combat and in propaganda. They know how to exploit the simple minded-manila centric media.

4. The muslims and christians can co-exist.

5. The christians can defend themselves against the armed muslim group, specially if they will be allowed to do so.

6. Firearms are highly valued among the muslims.

7. The muslims should not be insulted, specially their religious beliefs.

8. The ilonggos and antiquenios have the gall the stand against the moro fighters. But not the ilocanos or the cebuanos.

9. The muslims are ferocios when insulted and when in a group, but meek when alone. When you stand squarely against them, they will not bully you.

10. The typical muslim is not thesame person depicted in media. Many are now educated are now in the mainstream. But are still symphatetic with the muslim struggle.

11. The educated muslim, and the muslim in general,  are already averse to war. They want a normal life. Many are now going into business as their way out.

 

Since the time when this conflict errupted in the 70’s,  the approach of the national leadership is one that is similar to the philosopher’s of the ancient time looking for the ultimate answer.  But apparently there is no such animal, then we should be looking for piecemeal solution, for each piecemeal problem.

At the back of my mind, I believe that when local governments are given enough leeway on how to solve this problem, they can do it. As Gilbert Teodoro explicitely explained; the conflict in Lanao is not the same as the conflict in Sarangani, or the conflict in Cotabato, thus we cannot have a one size fit all solution, as echoed by Chiz Escudero. Very clearly, the solution to different problems should be to each its own peculiarity. The solution should be piecemeal, not one all encompasing treaty.

In negotiation, more participants should be from Mindanao. The prevalent approach is that the president appoints someone who normally comes from Luzon to negotiate with the rebels. This is the lament of the local people of Mindanao with  regards to negotiation. Let the mindanaoans negotiate for their own good. Let us no longer have the Esperon brouhaha.

Another simplistic solution would be education. I have seen it, and it is very clear. The educated muslim will not go into war.  Pour enough resources towards the education of the muslim youth. MSU and USM are big enough to cater to the educational needs of the muslim youth.

Governance in the muslim LGU’s should likewise be strengthened. Corruption is a very big problem. Far bigger than in the national government. What they need are not controls but capacity building. The national government an NGO’s should play an active role in this aspect. The local muslim politician needs guidance. Most have a very low education, and low sense of social responsibility. The likes of Adel Tamano, Sam Pangandaman, Baduy… should work towards this end.

 

There are still numerous approaches, but the four points; 1. Delocalize the approach, by giving local LGU’s more power and thus responsibility to solve their conflicts, 2. Let Mindanaoans negotiate with their muslim counterpart, 3. Pour more money on education of muslim youth, 4. Empower the local muslim leaders (also the christian leaders) though capacity building not controls. 

If the next president could work on those four aspects, I can say the situation here in Mindanao will be a lot peaceful, and investment will come in faster than it is coming now.

Posted by: luvin | October 6, 2009

After the Flood

After the flood now comes the mud. Slowly the floody situation is getting back to normal, and with that the political mudslinging will once again be the norm.

Ondoy did not only damage many home, it also destroyed Noynoy’s campaign momentum. Perhaps it is  a message from heaven.

On the other side, Ondoy did put Gilbert Teodoro on the front pages, on the tv screens almost daily. Surely, it will make a positive impact on his ratings.

“”"”"

Since Noynoy and Gibo will be two main ingredients in the forthcoming election, and If I am Teodoro’s campaign propagandist, I will package him this way.

;Gibo is the more qualified, the more intelligent cousin of Noynoy Aquino.

Posted by: luvin | September 28, 2009

The Ondoy Effect

The Ondoy Effect was a great equalizer. The rich and the poor during that horrible moment was on the same footing, on the roof  or on the road, all drenched, watching in horror and chilling to death.

One graphic note is penned by Leonor Magtolis;

from a txt mssg. “pls pray/help, my mom’s trap,…on a tree. She’s 71 and weak, I don’t know what to do.”

A 71 year old up on a lanka tree! She must have gone through the roof and swung Tarzan- like to the tree! How she did it is beyond my ken, but I sensed the panic and dispair…, I supposed extreme danger gives unusual physical strength even to the weak.”

The good news came later; the 71 year old lady was eventually rescued from the tree.

Honestly, the article inspite of the tragedy made me smile. It contrast to other  articles that irritates, because instead of offering solution, or helping people to understand why these  abnormally strong flood and typhoons are happening, are there to criticize some government officials.

What would these journalist say if as a Mindanaoan, who have endured so much (not only exploding bombs) negative media coverage, I would write merese, now were even. If people in Mindanao have to contend with the 40 year old conflict, you metro manila people now have to contend with the effect of uncontrolled urbanization.

Of course they will say that those statements are uncalled for specially in time of disaster. They will say that criticism can wait for its proper time. Indeed, the Ondoy Effect has a way of seeing, who has the agenda of simply dismembering this government, and those who simply write on the mandate of truthfully reporting the events of the day.

But will The Ondoy Effect tell the people to go easy on his environment. Will it warn the subdivision developers to rethink their projects and reasses its impact on the community. Will it inform the NGO’s that continued (pouring so much resources on such a small area) reforestation of La Mesa water shed is never enough to combat global warming. I doubt it. Greed will still overpower man’s concern for his environment. Greed will only stop when there is no other choice.

More floods with increasing strength will still be coming. All over the world, that’s the trend. And when it hits the highly urbanized places, the effect is magnified a thousand fold. Tipping point is near when we really have to do something to survive natures wrath.

Posted by: luvin | September 25, 2009

How to Select?

This coming 2010 presidential election, two of my kids will be voting for the first time.  A first time is always a momentuous event, infact it is a life changer event. More than the celebration of manhood or ladyhood, which we normally celebrate through a western copied practice of debut, voting signals their entry into the world of adulthood. They will not just be debutante, but votante. A first civic and legal action where they have the real opportunity to take the responsibility of deciding for their own future.

Naturally, as a father, I would like to give the correct guidance on whom to vote. But in the spirit of democracy, I can only guide them. They have the freedom to choose, however, this freedom is limited and constrained by their lack of proper knowledge on how to choose properly. Freedom could not be properly exercise when the person is not freed from the chain of ignorance.

The chain of ignorance has so many rings that our collective effort must break  to set us free. One of those ring is the falsehood, the halftruths that PR and advertising practineers resort to to sell their candidates.  The complexity of the modern day campaign techniques is beyond the grasp of even the most learned individual. Many will be drowned by the spin thrown left and right.  Campaign spin doctors operate like a large organization ganging up on the hapless little folks, and the we will have little chance but to swallow what is being thrust into our throat.

I cannot imagine the fisherman who have spent most of his life in the sea, who spends most of his days trying to feed his family, sifting through  the  maze that spin doctors have created.  I will not even give a fair chance to my kid, who will be graduating with a communication degree from the University of the Philippines, of identifying the truth from the half-truths. Not even my second kid whose IQ is 133 could protect himself from being influenced by the campaign.

We have a system that is stacked against the selection of the best or the right leaders.  We adapted the popular democracy model, where filipinos irregardless of educational attainment or their lack of it, will choose who is the best candidate. If Philippines is a large corporation, the selection of the CEO will be something like this. The chairman of the board, the division manager, the corporate strategist, the brightest researcher, the janitor, the guard, the factory worker, all have thesame right to vote. One vote each. The voice below will naturally win over. But will they be able to select the best candidate? Of course not.

Another bias of ours  that does not help is our inclination towards the perceived winner. I know Estrada is a proven failure, but he is still so popular that he might still win. I know Teodoro is intellectually and educationally qualified, but he is not so popular that he may never catch up. I know Noynoy is just a shadow of his parents, but the message of him being the messiah is strongly accepted, and he may win. 

Given the many enfluencers, what is the simplier method, the applicable method of choosing the best candidate? 

My simplistic approach would be; If you have a company (a business enterprise), would you choose that person (candidate) to be the manager? Would you hire him/her?

Older Posts »

Categories